Monthly Archives: April 2011

A complete blog overhaul

Posted in advantage in vintage, changing times, Horrockses by


As much as my blog title “High-waisted,? Corseted? Floral?” Is still very much me I feel its time for a change. Nothing major, just a little bit of an update now I am trying to get all technical and add things like twitter to my blog : /

I could realistically just call my blog obsessed with Horrockses, considering how much I write about the brand, and the simple fact that I rarely go a day without thinking about Horrockses dresses in some respect (it really is rather worrying. I have to say).

But no, something a little more different. The first thought that popped into my mind was The vintage Vanguardista ( Spanish meaning cutting-edge or avant guard) but I came to realise that actually when you translate it doesn’t really make that much sense I just liked the sound of it.

Then, after slipping into thoughts of summer time and watching the tennis it came to me Advantage in Vintage. I could play around with this idea all day long. The vintage advantage (go on try and say it, it’s a tongue twister if there ever was one!), Advintage or even just advantage vintage. So yes, a blog overhaul and a new name. Lovely.
The picture is of me wearing one of my beloved Horrockses dresses

Another Horrockses moment

Posted in Horrockses, New Look by

I think from the sheer volume of posts I write about Horrockses it could be said that I am a tad *just a tad* obsessed with the label. Anyway, whilst I was in New Look last weekend I spotted this dress, I would say it looks pretty familiar?!? It looks pretty nice on too…


http://www.newlook.com/shop/womens/dresses/dandelion-prom-dress_216436519

http://www.vandaimages.com/results.asp?image=2007BL7758-01&itemw=4&itemf=0001&itemstep=1&itemx=40

A certain sense of self satisfaction

Posted in Hampshire Museums Service, museum, portsmouth city museum, Roter couture, Vintage by

During my time at the museum service I have had a couple, what I would call “eureka” moments. For me that is discovering a garment in the collection advertised in a magazine or finding some kind of importance provenance. This happened twice whilst I was working on Little black dress. The first moment was with a dress by the company Susan Small. Whilst searching through copies of Vogues to display in the exhibition I suddenly stumbled across one of the dresses I had picked out! It was a real, goodness me! Moment. Seeing a dress in the collection on a human form really helps to give it a different meaning and helps you to see how it would have been worn at the time.


(its the dress on the left, apologies for the dark pic it was taken after the dress was put into the exhibition!)

The second time this happened to me was during exhibition set up. I was looking at a panel we had borrowed from Brighton museum and suddenly thought, that dress looks familiar. The dress in the image was a long sleeved dress by the company Roter Couture. I had chosen a similar dress to put in the exhibition although our was a shorter dress with short sleeves. I thought I would just check the dress and *see* if it may just happen to be the same dress but altered. Low and behold it was! (The dress has been turned into a short sleeve garment and the hem taken up by at least around 8 inches)

The only problem with the image on the panel was that it was quite small and difficult to see. Thankfully it was dated to 1956. I thought, maybe, just maybe this had come from a Vogue advertisement. So, again I went searching, and found it in the March 1956 issues of Vogue. I was very happy to have this kind of provenance appear again, and even better the dress had its full price and fabric details in the advertisement.




It is little details like this which really help to make exhibitions interesting for the public, all I can say is that I am pleased that my casual flicking turned up trumps on two occasions!